When should you move on?

Dear Clint,

I’ve been working at my company for the past five years, and I’ve noticed that the people who get ahead do so by taking sole credit for team wins, playing office politics (of the negative variety), and constantly trying to one-up other co-workers.

Is this normal? Should I find another job?

Sincerely,
Lindsay

Dear Lindsay,

This one is easy. Yes, you should leave. Today. We only get so many days in life. Losing one at a job or working for a leader who rewards "takers" is not worth it. In my experience, companies and communities led by takers almost always find themselves at the bottom of the ocean. Get off the ship!

What do I mean by takers?

I first learned the term after reading Adam Grant’s book * * "Give and Take: Why Helping Others Drives Our Success." It's a must-read for any leader. In fact, I'll give away 10 copies to the first 10 people who share this newsletter with a friend and forward that email to me at dearclint@ceo.com. The book explores how different approaches to reciprocity — giving, taking, and matching — affect success in both personal and professional environments. Grant categorizes people into three types:

1. Givers: Those who give more than they receive, focusing on others’ needs and contributing to their success.

2. Takers: Individuals who strive to get more than they give, putting their interests ahead of others.

3. Matchers: People who seek to maintain an equal balance between giving and receiving.

The book argues that although givers can be exploited and end up at the bottom of the success ladder, they are also more likely to reach the top. This success is rooted in the trust, goodwill, and support they build, which leads to more sustainable and impactful relationships.

Beyond success, ask yourself: Is where you end up on the ladder nearly as important as being able to sleep at night knowing you’re a good person?

Find the givers and matchers. Avoid takers at all costs.

Yours,
Clint Betts

Email: dearclint@ceo.com
Phone: (385) 217-0670